Fishes from Territorial Saudi Red Sea Watersالصفحة المطبوعة 239confidence: officially documentedverification: unverifiedthe evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Documentation status
documented from a photographed and measured specimen
No source is linked to this value.
Names
English common names
Marbled spinefoot
Local names — Saudi territorial waters, Arabian Gulf
صافيLocal nameLocal name, verified — not nationally approved
Local names — Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea
سيجانLocal nameLocal name, verified — not nationally approved
سيجان مخططLocal nameLocal name, verified — not nationally approved
National species code: 2703— Marine Research Centre, Jeddah
The national collection-form code is not a unique identifier; more than one taxon may carry the same value. The only stable identifier here is the HUWAT code.
Conservation
No governed conservation assessment is published for this taxon. The absence of a published assessment is not an assessment of low concern.
Distribution
The encyclopedia holds no published scientific distribution records for this taxon.
This section shows source-backed scientific distribution only. Community observations are not listed here and no scientific distribution is inferred from them.
Fishing and seasons
Abundance season, spawning season and legal closure are three separate things. Each line carries its kind of evidence, its region and its source; what is not documented is said to be undocumented.
Time of day
General handlining guidance from an FAO manual: the best times are usually early morning and late evening. It is general advice, not specific to this species and not backed by a Saudi study; the same manual advises also watching the current, the bottom and the presence of bait fish when choosing where to fish.General guidance — not species-specificGlobalSource
Handlining and squid jigging (FAO Training Series No. 23)
— Part I, section 8 "Deciding where and when to fish" (Moon and sun) · Scientifically documented States that, as a general rule, the best times for handlining are early in the morning and late in the evening; the right time also depends on the species and place.(our rendering of what the locator holds, not a quotation)
Fishery status
A 2025 study of 6,192 specimens from the Saudi Red Sea coast (2022–2024), caught with handline, trap, gillnet and demersal trawl: the analysis indicates slight overfishing, with exploitation of about 0.5–0.6 for ages 3–5 and a median size at first maturity of 14.83 cm TL. The abstract gives no spawning season, bait or fishing time.Measured in a studySaudi territorial waters, Red SeaSource
Taxa of the same family. That is a taxonomic relationship, not a statement of resemblance; the encyclopedia holds no diagnostic characters or lookalike relations yet.
Information not yet documented in this record
These fields are not yet documented for this taxon in the encyclopedia. Their absence describes the record, not the animal.
Habitat
Depth range
Maximum length
Maximum weight
Size at first maturity
Spawning period
Fishing season
Some of these fields do carry an unapproved draft value, shown with its source under “Information on this species” below. Their absence here means not approved, not absent.
Scientific sources
أسماك من المياه الإقليمية للمملكة في البحر الأحمر — مركز أبحاث الثروة السمكية، جـدة (2011).
ط١ ١٤٣٢هـ/٢٠١١م.
استمارة التجميع المرمزة للأسماء المحلية — مركز أبحاث الثروة السمكية.
Fishes from Territorial Saudi Red Sea Waters (2017).
الطبعة الثانية 1438 H - 2017.
Handlining and squid jigging (FAO Training Series No. 23) (1992).
ISBN 92-5-103100-2
Observations on the Biology and Fishery of the Marbled Spinefoot (Siganus rivulatus Forsskål & Niebuhr, 1775) in the Eastern Red Sea (2025).
DOI 10.3390/fishes10050219
The scientific sources above are the ones cited for the facts, names and identifiers on this page. The platform and founder attribution in the footer is not a scientific source. Community contributions appear with their names and review status. The verification shown beside a value means the register checked the value against its cited source; it is not a scientific approval and not an independent peer review.