COMPARE

Compare two species

Two published records side by side, field by field. Each row says in words whether the two sides are the same, differ, or only one holds a record, and each empty cell says why it is empty. Only published records appear, and every value carries its reference.

Fields side by side

Fields shown: 21 — same: 3, differ: 3, only one side holds a record: 6, neither holds one: 7, each has its own: 2.

Field First Penaeus pulchricaudatus HWT-SHRIMP-0003 Second Penaeus latisulcatus HWT-SHRIMP-0009 Comparison
Plate
  • Penaeus pulchricaudatus © Chan T. Y. & Lin C. W.; MNHN Paris, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0
  • Penaeus latisulcatus © Museums Victoria, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0
Each has its own
Stable identifier
  • HWT-SHRIMP-0003
  • HWT-SHRIMP-0009
Each has its own
Taxonomic rank
  • Species
  • Species
Same
Authority and year
  • Stebbing, 1914
  • Kishinouye, 1896
Differs
English name The register holds no verified English name for this taxon. The register holds no verified English name for this taxon. Neither has a record
Nationally approved Arabic name No nationally approved Arabic name exists for this taxon; verified local names are shown in the next two rows, as what they are. No nationally approved Arabic name exists for this taxon; verified local names are shown in the next two rows, as what they are. Neither has a record
Local name — Red Sea A name recorded for this sea; it is not an occurrence record. No verified local name is recorded for the Red Sea. No verified local name is recorded for the Red Sea. Neither has a record
Local name — Arabian Gulf A name recorded for this sea; it is not an occurrence record. No verified local name is recorded for the Arabian Gulf. No verified local name is recorded for the Arabian Gulf. Neither has a record
Family Same
Order
  • Decapoda
  • Decapoda
Same
National code This record carries no national code. This record carries no national code. Neither has a record
Measured specimen length The length of a measured specimen, not the maximum length of the species. The register holds no measured specimen length. The register holds no measured specimen length. Neither has a record
Published conservation status No conservation assessment is published for this record. No conservation assessment is published for this record. Neither has a record
Distribution
  • Saudi Red Sea: 3,274 individuals (3% by number) in the fishery-independent trawl surveys off Jizan and Al Qunfudhah, October 2022 to September 2023. Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea Reference 11 — Results 3.1 · verified
  • Saudi Arabian Gulf coast: preserved specimens held by the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (USNM) and published through GBIF, among them Safaniya (north of Safaniya Hill) (1982), Jurayd Island (north-east end) (1981), Abu Ali Island (1971). The GBIF records give Isabel Pérez Farfante as the determiner. Museum specimen records: not an estimate of abundance and not a statement about the species today. Saudi territorial waters, Arabian Gulf Reference 120 — Occurrence record · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation Reference 121 — Occurrence record · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation Reference 122 — Occurrence record · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
  • According to the FAO sheet (1983): within the area from south-east Africa to the Gulf of Oman and the “Gulf”, the Red Sea, Madagascar, Mauritius, La Réunion and Seychelles; also the southern coast of India and Sri Lanka; further east from Burma to Korea and Japan, New Guinea, Australia and Fiji. A regional statement; the Saudi Gulf record of the species is the specimens named above. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Melicertus) latisulcatus sheet: geographical distribution · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Differs
Catch per unit effort
  • 0.049 kg/h Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea Reference 24 — Section 3 (Results), Table 1; Section 2.2 (Data Collection) · verified
The register holds no row for this field. Only the first has a record
Study sample count
  • 3274 Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea Reference 11 — Results 3.1 (species composition, n = 103,758 individuals, shares by number) · verified
The register holds no row for this field. Only the first has a record
Share of the study sample
  • 3 % Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea Reference 11 — Results 3.1 (species composition, n = 103,758 individuals, shares by number) · verified
The register holds no row for this field. Only the first has a record
Morphology The register holds no row for this field.
  • According to the FAO identification sheet (western Indian Ocean, 1983): carapace smooth; rostrum with 9 to 12 teeth on the dorsal margin and a single tooth on the ventral margin; gastrofrontal crest present; telson armed with 3 pairs of movable spines; no ischial spine on the first pereopod. Colour: body pale yellow to brown; dorsal crests dark brown; the pleura of the first 5 abdominal segments each with a short vertical red or brown stripe. A description for the western Indian Ocean (FAO Area 51), not a Saudi study. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Melicertus) latisulcatus sheet: distinctive characters · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Only the second has a record
Habitat and distribution The register holds no row for this field.
  • According to the FAO sheet (1983): found from the coastline to depths of about 80 m, occasionally deeper, on sand or mud, with a clear preference in many localities for sandy substrates; nocturnal, burying in the seabed in daytime and emerging at night to feed. A description for the western Indian Ocean (FAO Area 51), not a Saudi study. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Melicertus) latisulcatus sheet: geographical distribution and behaviour · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Only the second has a record
Identity and names The register holds no row for this field.
  • WoRMS records the name Penaeus latisulcatus Kishinouye, 1896 as a “superseded combination”, its accepted name being Penaeus (Oleopenaeus) latisulcatus; the encyclopedia keeps the genus Penaeus as it does for its other species. Penaeus hathor is a separate accepted species that was originally described as a subspecies of P. latisulcatus. Reference 14 — AphiaRecordsByName, retrieved 17 October 2026 · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Only the second has a record
Sources Differs

An empty cell describes the register, not the animal: it does not mean the value is zero, or that science does not know it. A row carrying a state phrase ("unknown", "not recorded in the source") holds an explicit record saying so. A local name recorded for a sea is not an occurrence record, and a value two records share does not make them one record.

What the words in the comparison column mean
Same
Both sides hold the same value.
Differs
Both sides hold a value, and the two values are not the same.
Only the first / only the second has a record
The other side holds no row in the register for this field, and its cell says why.
Neither has a record
Neither side holds a row for this field.
Each has its own
A field whose two values are not compared: two identifiers, two plates; each record has its own.