COMPARE

Compare two species

Two published records side by side, field by field. Each row says in words whether the two sides are the same, differ, or only one holds a record, and each empty cell says why it is empty. Only published records appear, and every value carries its reference.

Fields side by side

Fields shown: 21 — same: 3, differ: 5, only one side holds a record: 5, neither holds one: 6, each has its own: 2.

Field First Penaeus latisulcatus HWT-SHRIMP-0009 Second Penaeus monodon HWT-SHRIMP-0006 Comparison
Plate
  • Penaeus latisulcatus © Museums Victoria, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0
  • Penaeus monodon © (c) Afsar Nayakkan, some rights reserved (CC BY), via iNaturalist observation 284214961 · CC BY 4.0
Each has its own
Stable identifier
  • HWT-SHRIMP-0009
  • HWT-SHRIMP-0006
Each has its own
Taxonomic rank
  • Species
  • Species
Same
Authority and year
  • Kishinouye, 1896
  • Fabricius, 1798
Differs
English name The register holds no verified English name for this taxon.
  • giant tiger prawn
  • black tiger prawn
  • Asian tiger shrimp
Only the second has a record
Nationally approved Arabic name No nationally approved Arabic name exists for this taxon; verified local names are shown in the next two rows, as what they are. No nationally approved Arabic name exists for this taxon; verified local names are shown in the next two rows, as what they are. Neither has a record
Local name — Red Sea A name recorded for this sea; it is not an occurrence record. No verified local name is recorded for the Red Sea. No verified local name is recorded for the Red Sea. Neither has a record
Local name — Arabian Gulf A name recorded for this sea; it is not an occurrence record. No verified local name is recorded for the Arabian Gulf. No verified local name is recorded for the Arabian Gulf. Neither has a record
Family Same
Order
  • Decapoda
  • Decapoda
Same
National code This record carries no national code. This record carries no national code. Neither has a record
Measured specimen length The length of a measured specimen, not the maximum length of the species. The register holds no measured specimen length. The register holds no measured specimen length. Neither has a record
Published conservation status No conservation assessment is published for this record. No conservation assessment is published for this record. Neither has a record
Distribution
  • Saudi Arabian Gulf coast: preserved specimens held by the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (USNM) and published through GBIF, among them Safaniya (north of Safaniya Hill) (1982), Jurayd Island (north-east end) (1981), Abu Ali Island (1971). The GBIF records give Isabel Pérez Farfante as the determiner. Museum specimen records: not an estimate of abundance and not a statement about the species today. Saudi territorial waters, Arabian Gulf Reference 120 — Occurrence record · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation Reference 121 — Occurrence record · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation Reference 122 — Occurrence record · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
  • According to the FAO sheet (1983): within the area from south-east Africa to the Gulf of Oman and the “Gulf”, the Red Sea, Madagascar, Mauritius, La Réunion and Seychelles; also the southern coast of India and Sri Lanka; further east from Burma to Korea and Japan, New Guinea, Australia and Fiji. A regional statement; the Saudi Gulf record of the species is the specimens named above. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Melicertus) latisulcatus sheet: geographical distribution · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
  • Saudi Red Sea: recorded but rare, 17 individuals (0.02% by number) in the fishery-independent trawl surveys off Jizan and Al Qunfudhah, October 2022 to September 2023. Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea Reference 11 — Results 3.1 · verified
  • According to the FAO sheet (1983): within the area from south and east Africa to the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea, the west coast of Madagascar, Mauritius and La Réunion, and from Pakistan to south India and Sri Lanka, extending east as far as China and Japan, the Philippines, New Guinea and Australia. A regional statement that does not name Saudi Arabia. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Penaeus) monodon sheet: geographical distribution · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Differs
Morphology
  • According to the FAO identification sheet (western Indian Ocean, 1983): carapace smooth; rostrum with 9 to 12 teeth on the dorsal margin and a single tooth on the ventral margin; gastrofrontal crest present; telson armed with 3 pairs of movable spines; no ischial spine on the first pereopod. Colour: body pale yellow to brown; dorsal crests dark brown; the pleura of the first 5 abdominal segments each with a short vertical red or brown stripe. A description for the western Indian Ocean (FAO Area 51), not a Saudi study. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Melicertus) latisulcatus sheet: distinctive characters · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
  • According to the FAO identification sheet (western Indian Ocean, 1983): carapace smooth; rostrum with 7 or 8 teeth on the dorsal margin and 3 or 4 (rarely 2) on the ventral margin; gastrofrontal crest absent; fifth pereopod without an exopod. Colour: body green-grey to brown, sometimes reddish or bluish; abdomen with dark brown to dark grey and pale yellow dorsal transverse bands; antennae uniform pink-brown. A description for the western Indian Ocean (FAO Area 51), not a Saudi study. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Penaeus) monodon sheet: distinctive characters · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Differs
Habitat and distribution
  • According to the FAO sheet (1983): found from the coastline to depths of about 80 m, occasionally deeper, on sand or mud, with a clear preference in many localities for sandy substrates; nocturnal, burying in the seabed in daytime and emerging at night to feed. A description for the western Indian Ocean (FAO Area 51), not a Saudi study. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Melicertus) latisulcatus sheet: geographical distribution and behaviour · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
  • According to the FAO sheet (1983): found from the coast to about 150 m, occasionally deeper; the largest concentrations are fished in less than 60 m on mud or sand, sometimes mixed with shell fragments; juveniles are found in mangrove swamps, estuaries or backwaters; more easily available at night. A description for the western Indian Ocean (FAO Area 51), not a Saudi study. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Penaeus) monodon sheet: geographical distribution and behaviour · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Differs
Identity and names
  • WoRMS records the name Penaeus latisulcatus Kishinouye, 1896 as a “superseded combination”, its accepted name being Penaeus (Oleopenaeus) latisulcatus; the encyclopedia keeps the genus Penaeus as it does for its other species. Penaeus hathor is a separate accepted species that was originally described as a subspecies of P. latisulcatus. Reference 14 — AphiaRecordsByName, retrieved 17 October 2026 · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
The register holds no row for this field. Only the first has a record
General description The register holds no row for this field.
  • Maximum total length (TL) printed by the FAO sheet (1983): males 26.8 cm, females 33.7 cm; the sheet calls it the largest penaeid known. It is a maximum recorded total length, not a common size and not a measurement made in Saudi waters. Reference 110 — Penaeus (Penaeus) monodon sheet: size · verified the evidence is a rendering of what the locator holds, not a verbatim quotation
Only the second has a record
Study sample count The register holds no row for this field.
  • 17 Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea Reference 11 — Results 3.1 (species composition, n = 103,758 individuals, shares by number) · verified
Only the second has a record
Share of the study sample The register holds no row for this field.
  • 0.02 % Saudi territorial waters, Red Sea Reference 11 — Results 3.1 (species composition, n = 103,758 individuals, shares by number) · verified
Only the second has a record
Sources Differs

An empty cell describes the register, not the animal: it does not mean the value is zero, or that science does not know it. A row carrying a state phrase ("unknown", "not recorded in the source") holds an explicit record saying so. A local name recorded for a sea is not an occurrence record, and a value two records share does not make them one record.

What the words in the comparison column mean
Same
Both sides hold the same value.
Differs
Both sides hold a value, and the two values are not the same.
Only the first / only the second has a record
The other side holds no row in the register for this field, and its cell says why.
Neither has a record
Neither side holds a row for this field.
Each has its own
A field whose two values are not compared: two identifiers, two plates; each record has its own.